JBJS

Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: To Fuse or Not To Fuse: A Single-Center Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes of 450 Patients

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2026 Apr 1. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.25.01113. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Optimal surgical treatment for recurrence of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) remains controversial, with options ranging from repeat microdiscectomy (MD) to instrumented fusion (IF). This study aimed to guide surgical decision-making by analyzing reoperation rates, clinical and radiographic risk factors for treatment failure, and functional outcomes following MD versus IF.

METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 450 patients in our outcomes database who underwent surgery for recurrent LDH from 2004 through 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical assessment included predominant symptoms, neurological deficits, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade. Radiographic assessment included disc height, Pfirrmann grade, facet angle, and Modic changes on magnetic resonance imaging, as well as spinopelvic parameters on standing radiographs. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) and achievement of the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of ≥2.2 points. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed to control for confounding factors. Reoperation rates were analyzed with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

RESULTS: Of 450 patients with recurrent LDH, 316 (70.2%) underwent MD and 134 (29.8%) underwent IF. In 192 patients after PSM, IF showed nonsignificantly higher MCIC achievement (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66 to 2.17, p = 0.65) and lower COMI scores compared with the MD group (3.34 ± 2.89 versus 4.01 ± 2.95, p = 0.059; derived Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]: 23.8 versus 28.1). IF demonstrated significantly lower reoperation risk compared with MD (15.7% [116/316] versus 36.7% [21/34], p < 0.001). The reoperations following MD were predominantly subsequent IF (73.3%) and repeat MD (23.3%), while the reoperations after IF were predominantly adjacent segment surgery (57.1%) and hardware revision (33.3%). BMI of ≥35 kg/m2 was a significant predictor of reoperation after MD (univariate OR = 3.63, p = 0.039), while disc height of <6 mm (OR = 1.97) and Modic type-1 changes (OR = 1.78) showed trends toward increased reoperation risk (both p < 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS: Although both procedures achieved clinical improvement, IF demonstrated superior long-term durability as shown by significantly lower reoperation rates over extended follow-up. Our findings support a risk-stratified surgical selection: IF should be strongly considered in patients with BMI of ≥35 kg/m2 and those with progressive disc degeneration, whereas MD remains appropriate for patients without these risk factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PMID:41921058 | DOI:10.2106/JBJS.25.01113

No Mid-Term Benefits of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2026 Apr 1. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.25.00879. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) on medical complications, implant failure rates, and health-care-related costs in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty.

METHODS: A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and the UK Clinical Trials Gateway, was conducted and was limited to studies from database inception to March 31, 2025. Inclusion criteria comprised randomized controlled trials or cohort studies involving adults (≥18 years old) undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) while receiving a GLP-1 RA treatment of any dosage or duration. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions) assessment. Due to substantial heterogeneity in the study designs, a qualitative synthesis approach was employed.

RESULTS: Eight retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 22,611 GLP-1 RA users and 77,810 controls. The mean patient age ranged from 56 to 64 years. Hospital readmission rates showed the most consistently favorable results among GLP-1 RA users, with 3 studies reporting significant reductions of 29% to 47% during the 90-day postoperative period. Five studies demonstrated that GLP-1 RA use was associated with significant reductions, ranging from 30% to 44%, in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates, whereas 3 studies found no significant differences. Hospital resource utilization favored GLP-1 RA therapy, with several studies demonstrating shorter hospital stays and lower 90-day costs. Medical complications yielded variable results: some studies reported increased vascular and pulmonary events among GLP-1 RA users, whereas others observed reduced sepsis and hypoglycemic events in those patients.

CONCLUSIONS: GLP-1 RA therapy was associated with reduced hospital readmissions and decreased hospital costs within 90 days postoperatively, although its benefits for PJI prevention showed mixed results, with some studies demonstrating significant reductions in PJI while others showed no difference. No consistent clinical advantages were observed at the 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PMID:41921052 | DOI:10.2106/JBJS.25.00879

Clinical Outcomes Following Open Tibial Fractures in Latin America: A Multicenter Prospective Study

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2026 Apr 1. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.25.01082. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The study compared health-related quality of life and fracture-healing based on the fixation method following isolated open tibial fractures in Latin America.

METHODS: A prospective study was conducted across 18 trauma centers in 8 countries. Adult patients with isolated open tibial diaphyseal fractures were included. The primary outcome measures were Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), which was administered at baseline and at follow-up at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. The secondary outcome measure was the modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial Fractures (mRUST) score.

RESULTS: Of 422 patients, 389 had a baseline evaluation, with 352 (83.4% of the 422) completing at least 1 SF-12 follow-up and 309 (73.2%) completing at least 1 SF-12 follow-up and having radiographic follow-up within 1 year postoperatively. Initial definitive intramedullary nailing and external fixation or casting followed by staged intramedullary nailing were the most common fixation strategies. Both fixation methods were performed with similar frequency for Gustilo-Anderson (GA) Type-I and II injuries. The majority of GA Type-IIIA and IIIB/C fractures were treated with staged fixation. The presence of minimal or superficial contamination did not influence whether fractures were treated with initial intramedullary nailing or staged intramedullary nailing, whereas the presence of deep contamination was associated with staged management. For all GA types combined, initial definitive intramedullary nailing was associated with significantly higher PCS and MCS scores at 1 year than staged fixation. The mRUST scores at 1 year for all GA types combined were higher with initial definitive intramedullary nailing than with staged intramedullary nailing.

CONCLUSIONS: Staged treatment remains common in Latin America, even for less severe injuries. Initial intramedullary nailing was associated with improved PCS and MCS scores and significantly higher mRUST scores relative to staged intramedullary nailing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PMID:41921051 | DOI:10.2106/JBJS.25.01082

One-Stage Versus Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Randomized Trial

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2026 Apr 1. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.25.00713. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A 2-stage approach is most commonly used to treat periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Some successful studies of the 1-stage approach were underpowered, lacked a 2-stage comparative group, and excluded patients with draining sinuses, comorbidities, and/or antibiotic-resistant organisms. Given the morbidity and expense associated with 2-stage treatment, we conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial to compare the results of 1- and 2-stage PJI treatment, specifically including patients with draining sinuses, comorbidities, and resistant organisms.

METHODS: Patients presenting for surgical treatment of a chronic PJI with a known organism following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty were included (with infection defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society [MSIS] criteria). Patients with prior revision, culture-negative infection, or fungal infection, or who were immunosuppressed or had soft-tissue involvement precluding wound closure, were excluded. Patients were classified according to the McPherson host staging system. Clinical success was defined as (1) no clinical failure or reinfection with the same or new organism; (2) no reoperation for PJI; and (3) no PJI-related death. A double-instrument setup was used for all patients, as were similar irrigation and antibiotic protocols. A total of 323 patients (166 one-stage; 157 two-stage) were randomized. Groups were similar with respect to demographics and host classification. After excluding patients who died or were lost to follow-up, 258 of the 323 patients had 2-year follow-up (135 one-stage and 123 two-stage). The rate of patient loss to follow-up was similar between the treatment groups.

RESULTS: Sixteen patients in the 1-stage group and 9 patients in the 2-stage group died prior to 2-year follow-up. Overall, the 2-year success rate of 1-stage treatment was 97% (131 of 135), while the success of 2-stage treatment was 91% (112 of 123) (p = 0.04). Compared with the 2-stage group, the 1-stage group had 3-times the odds of overall success in a regression analysis (unadjusted odds ratio = 3.22 [95% confidence interval = 1.0 to 10.38]). After adjusting for specific variables (McPherson host grade, resistant organism, and draining sinuses), 1-stage treatment also had 3-times the odds of success.

CONCLUSIONS: The results of this prospective randomized trial indicated that 1-stage treatment (97% success) was statistically noninferior to 2-stage treatment (91% success) when treating chronic PJI following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty, provided the protocols described here are explicitly followed. Extrapolation to other patient cohorts and clinical situations should be avoided.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PMID:41921050 | DOI:10.2106/JBJS.25.00713

Greater Valgus Alignment in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients with a Primary ACL Tear Compared with Healthy Controls

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2026 Apr 1. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.25.01359. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronal plane angular deformity remains under-investigated in the context of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. We hypothesized that baseline coronal alignment in pediatric and adolescent patients with a first-time ACL injury would differ from that in a matched healthy comparison population of patients without knee pathology.

METHODS: Patients ≤18 years of age who underwent primary ACL reconstruction and had preoperative lower-extremity hip-to-ankle alignment radiographs (cases) and individuals without lower-extremity conditions that would influence alignment (controls) were matched 1:1 on the basis of age (±1 year) and sex. Coronal plane parameters included the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical axis deviation (MAD), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). Decision stump analyses were used to identify clinically relevant alignment threshold values.

RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included in the analysis (100 per group). The mean age was 12.7 ± 2.1 years in the ACL group (58% White/Caucasian, 50% female) and 13.1 ± 2.4 years in the control group (49% White/Caucasian, 50% female). Compared with controls, patients with an ACL tear demonstrated increased valgus alignment across all 4 parameters: MAD (-4.1 ± 7.8 versus -0.3 ± 7.6 mm; p < 0.001), HKA (-1.4° ± 2.6° versus -0.5° ± 2.3°; p = 0.006), mLDFA (85.3° ± 1.9° versus 86.1° ± 1.7°; p = 0.004), and MPTA (88.0° ± 1.8° versus 87.2° ± 1.9°; p = 0.004). Conditional logistic regression demonstrated increased odds of an ACL tear associated with each 1-unit increase in valgus alignment, as measured by MAD (inverse odds ratio [OR]: 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 to 1.10; p = 0.003), HKA (inverse OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.27; p = 0.022), mLDFA (inverse OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.50; p = 0.005), and MPTA (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.53; p = 0.006). In the decision stump analysis of HKA, a value of -0.5° demonstrated that 60% of participants with ≥0.5° of valgus alignment had an ACL tear compared with 38% of patients with neutral alignment, varus alignment, or <0.5° of valgus alignment.

CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric and adolescent patients with an ACL tear demonstrated greater valgus alignment than age- and sex-matched controls, with each 1° increase in HKA valgus alignment increasing the odds of an ACL tear by 14%. Routine preoperative assessment is necessary as coronal plane deformity is modifiable through concomitant implant-mediated guided growth in skeletally immature patients. The inclusion of coronal plane alignment parameters in ACL-related investigations is warranted to elucidate their contribution to injury risk and surgical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PMID:41921048 | DOI:10.2106/JBJS.25.01359

Effect of Timing of First Consultation with a Sarcoma Specialist Following Unplanned Excision: Oncologic Outcomes of Patients with Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2026 Mar 25. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.25.01239. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Unplanned excisions (UEs) of soft-tissue sarcoma are resections performed without appropriate preoperative imaging or biopsy confirmation. These procedures represent a large proportion of referrals to sarcoma centers and can negatively influence oncologic outcomes. Limited evidence exists regarding the impact of consultation timing after UE. This study aimed to compare oncologic outcomes of patients evaluated early versus late at a sarcoma center following UE.

METHODS: Of 397 patients treated for soft-tissue sarcoma from 2012 to 2020 at 2 tertiary centers, 117 underwent UE followed by later tumor bed excision and were analyzed. Consultation with a sarcoma specialist was defined as the patient's first visit with a multidisciplinary sarcoma team member, marking entry into the coordinated cancer center. Patients were stratified into early (≤2 months) and late (>2 months) consultation groups. Demographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics were collected. Primary outcomes included local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Chi-square and t tests were used for univariate comparisons, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. Multivariable Cox regression and logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusting for patient age, sex, and comorbidities; tumor size, depth, grade, stage, and margin status; and/or follow-up duration.

RESULTS: Among the 117 patients (mean age, 56 years; 55% female; 84% White; 65% non-Hispanic), 26 were seen early and 91 late. The rate of metastasis was significantly higher in the late cohort (48.4% versus 11.5%, p = 0.0016), as was mortality (30.8% versus 3.8%, p = 0.0109). Five-year Kaplan-Meier survival outcomes favored early consultation, including LRFS (84.6% versus 63.7%, p = 0.041), MFS (88.5% versus 50.5%, p = 0.003), and OS (96.2% versus 64.8%, p = 0.005). On multivariable analysis, late consultation was independently associated with inferior LRFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.95, p = 0.046), MFS (HR = 2.76, p = 0.004), and OS (HR = 2.53, p = 0.022). Logistic regression showed increased odds of metastasis (odds ratio [OR] = 7.11, p = 0.0027) and mortality (OR = 11.29, p = 0.021) at 5 years in the late group.

CONCLUSIONS: Delayed consultation after UE was associated with significantly worse outcomes, including higher rates of metastasis and mortality and lower LRFS, MFS, and OS. These results emphasize the importance of timely referral to sarcoma centers for early multidisciplinary management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PMID:41880536 | DOI:10.2106/JBJS.25.01239

Outcomes and Complications of Vertebral Body Tethering in Skeletally Immature Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2026 Mar 24. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.25.01102. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) aims to gradually correct scoliosis using patients' growth while preserving spinal motion. We report 5 to 8-year outcomes and complications in skeletally immature patients.

METHODS: This prospective single-center cohort study included 74 patients who had idiopathic scoliosis and a ≥5-year follow-up. Preoperative, first postoperative visit, 1-year, 2-year, and ≥5-year radiographs were analyzed. A ≥5° increase in the interscrew angle suggested tether breakage.

RESULTS: All 74 patients (5 male and 69 female) were skeletally immature at surgery. The mean age at surgery was 11.8 ± 1.3 years, and the mean follow-up time was 63.4 ± 8.4 months. Of the 74 patients, 68 patients were White, 4 were Black, and 2 were Middle Eastern or North African. VBT was performed on a mean of 7.4 vertebral levels. The maximum Cobb angle was 47.9° ± 9.4° preoperatively, whereas the instrumented Cobb angle measured 17.2° ± 12.3° at 2 years and 25.7° ± 14.0° at ≥5 years postoperatively. An unplanned return to the operating room occurred in 16 patients (21.6%). Forty-nine patients (66%) had a suspected broken tether at the final follow-up. The mean time of the first tether breakage was 38.1 ± 15 months. Forty-nine patients (66%) also had a curve of <40° without an unplanned return to the operating room at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, 66% (49 patients) had a radiographically suspected tether breakage after 5 years and 13.5% (10 patients) required posterior spinal fusion to date. VBT yielded significant correction in the coronal plane (p < 0.001) and transverse plane (p = 0.006) postoperatively, with a reoperation rate of 21.6%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PMID:41875234 | DOI:10.2106/JBJS.25.01102

MRI-Based Synthetic CT Shows Promise as a Radiation-Free Alternative to Conventional CT in Orthopaedics

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2026 Mar 24. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.25.00976. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

➢ Computed tomography (CT) remains the gold standard for bone imaging, but radiation risks, especially in children, are driving interest in alternatives.➢ Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based techniques are emerging as a radiation-free alternative to CT, using sequences such as zero echo time, ultrashort echo time, and 3-dimensional (3D) gradient recalled echo, along with deep learning-based synthetic CT.➢ Zero echo time MRI stands out for its high-resolution and silent imaging, whereas 3D gradient recalled echo offers widespread availability and minimal requirements for implementation.➢ Early studies have shown high agreement of all modalities with CT across multiple anatomical sites, supporting broader clinical use, especially in pediatrics, surgical planning, and cost-reduction efforts.➢ Deep learning-based synthetic CT demonstrates strong potential given its ability to improve over time and to generate highly accurate CT-like images, although current applications are limited by existing training data.

PMID:41875228 | DOI:10.2106/JBJS.25.00976

Pages